- R v B (2019). Prosecuted an appeal against terms of a Criminal Behaviour Order. This included drafting a skeleton argument defending the terms sought.
- R v B (2019). Defended a man, with many similar previous convictions, of going equipped for burglary. Argument was about the weight that should be given to circumstantial evidence.
- R v J (2019). Defended a young man at trial charged with ABH. The prosecution submitted a tumbler was thrown directly at ex-girlfriend’s face; the defendant said it was thrown to the ground and rebounded. Bad character of the defendant was raised by several gateways.
- R v H (2020). Defended a serial domestic burglar in the face of strong evidence, including significant bad character, and an amended defence statement following additional DNA evidence.
- R v P (2020). Prosecuting counsel for legal argument around terms of proposed Sexual Harm Prevention Order following conviction for voyeurism and outraging public decency. The defendant had a previous conviction and extended sentence licence from a different jurisdiction. The case included application for a reporting restriction in respect of a complainant.
- R v R (2020). Prosecuted offence of domestic violence related aggravated burglary/s18 GBH. Defence witnesses included the 16-year-old son of complainant and defendant. Resisted application to sever the indictment and application to adduce bad character of non-defendants.
- R v D (2021). Defended a young, vulnerable man accused of possession with intent to supply Class A drugs, supply of Class A drugs, and possession of offensive weapon. Offences from two separate incidents were joined. Defendant had assistance of an intermediary for first day of trial.
- R v Mc (2021). Prosecuted a man for making and distributing indecent images of children. Trial included lengthy agreed facts and jury bundle of communications. Resisted defence application to exclude content that showed a sexual interest in children and messages regarding his step-daughter that the defence deemed prejudicial.
- R v H (2021). Prosecuted a three-day trial of issue about the extent of dishonesty regarding ~£17,000 theft by an employed carer from a dying man in a hospice. Included detailed financial data and employer’s investigation.
- R v D (2021). Prosecuted a seven-day trial with lengthy ABE evidence on assault ABH and coercive or controlling behaviour. Both the victim and defendant were elderly and vulnerable. The defence made applications for third-party disclosure and non-defendant bad character. Trial included extensive jury bundles for both prosecution and defence with handwritten notes, letters and diaries, medical records, and counselling records.